Chapter 3: Initiation
Many thoughts that I have never considered before crossed my mind as I read chapter three. While one certainly loses the will to stay sanitized when put into and environment like that of the concentration camps and therefore is often careless about trivial things, one can also simultaneously be very thoughtful of small things. In the chapter, for example, Primo Levi claims the act of washing one’s hand in the concentration camps as worthless and futile, considering the general unclean state of the camps. He then thinks deeply about the act in terms of obeying the codes and rules set by the Nazi’s in the camps. As worthless the act of washing one’s hands in the camps can be, Levi debates within him the significance of doing so. He thinks about the point of view held by the ex-sergeant Steinlauf, which claims that washing one’s hand provides a mental strength to survive the brutality of the persecution. So I thought when one is degraded to a severe level and can barely survive, one probably focuses on things only related to one’s survival, but also could contemplate about small things that one usually takes for granted, like washing hands.
I also thought about Steinlauf’s view on the significance of washing oneself. Levi states that Steinlauf thought that one should wash “not because the regulation states it, but for dignify and propriety. [One] must walk erect, without dragging [one’s] feet, not in homage to Prussian discipline but to remain alive, not to begin to die.” Here Steinlauf implies that washing is actually an act of rebellion rather than consent (with authority). I debated whether trying to disobey the Nazi’s in a way can be beneficial to the people in the camps, and I actually thought that it was better to obey the orders given, while still keeping alive one’s faith. Just because one obeys authority does not mean he is deprived of hope; a Jew in the camp can do what the Nazi’s tell him to do and still be vital enough to seek survival. I actually think Steinlauf is optimistic, which is good, but the way he reaches it will give a disadvantage to people. A person with a disobedient state of mind will only be harmed more than one with an obedient, yet hopeful mind.
In sun, I realized the mental change and complexity one faces when severely displaced from one’s usual life. Primo Levi shows the extremities of his thoughts at the camps in this chapter, those usually unseen in people living in normal conditions.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Thursday, February 15, 2007
"On the Bottom"
Chapter 2: On the Bottom
Primo Levi describes the condition of his mind in chapter 2. He states that he, along with the other prisoners, is in the lowest state a human can be. He says that they are deprived of virtually everything they have, including their name; they are given numbers. In my opinion, the Jews in the concentration camps were treated worse than dogs. I guess the Nazis did not actually see the Jews as humans. That is why Primo Levi says the Germans “give us nothing to drink, while nobody explains anything, and we have no shoes or clothes, but we are all naked with our feet and the water.” The Nazis were unconcerned about the needs or questions of the Jews.
I wonder if Primo Levi had any hope in surviving or escaping the camps. He states that anyone who thinks that he will survive in the camps is crazy, and all will eventually die, but I am doubtful of this assertion. Certainly he would have a bit of hope of returning to his normal life, even merely by thinking about the outrageousness or absurdity of his own situation. However, I understand the discouragement he would have had in such a degrading environment. The whole purpose of the Germans in sending Jews to the concentration camps was to make them feel that they are worthless.
I had to be thankful of what I am and what I have right now. There are many who value me including my family and friends, and therefore I value myself. Primo Levi in turn had none of this when he was sent to Birkenau. What I take for granted would have been of enormous value to him.
Primo Levi describes the condition of his mind in chapter 2. He states that he, along with the other prisoners, is in the lowest state a human can be. He says that they are deprived of virtually everything they have, including their name; they are given numbers. In my opinion, the Jews in the concentration camps were treated worse than dogs. I guess the Nazis did not actually see the Jews as humans. That is why Primo Levi says the Germans “give us nothing to drink, while nobody explains anything, and we have no shoes or clothes, but we are all naked with our feet and the water.” The Nazis were unconcerned about the needs or questions of the Jews.
I wonder if Primo Levi had any hope in surviving or escaping the camps. He states that anyone who thinks that he will survive in the camps is crazy, and all will eventually die, but I am doubtful of this assertion. Certainly he would have a bit of hope of returning to his normal life, even merely by thinking about the outrageousness or absurdity of his own situation. However, I understand the discouragement he would have had in such a degrading environment. The whole purpose of the Germans in sending Jews to the concentration camps was to make them feel that they are worthless.
I had to be thankful of what I am and what I have right now. There are many who value me including my family and friends, and therefore I value myself. Primo Levi in turn had none of this when he was sent to Birkenau. What I take for granted would have been of enormous value to him.
Monday, February 12, 2007
Start of a journey to the abyss
Chapter 1: The Journey
The first chapter of this book reveals much of the true picture of Jewish imprisonment to the concentration camps established by the Nazis. Especially since the book is primarily a first-hand account, it is likely that the author shows a lot of the general feelings that most Jews had when they were sent to the concentration camps, not just the facts of the process of the imprisonment. Most of these feelings were expressed as despair and hopelessness in the first chapter, as they were being sent to the camps on trains.
In the first chapter, I read about the frequently mentioned cruelties of the holocaust, including the disregarding of the German SS soldiers of Jews as humans. A quote in the book says, “Only a profound amazement: how can one hit a man without anger?” I was not surprised by the fact that the Nazi’s severely degraded the Jews’ statuses as humans, but only sickened again by this fact, which I have known for quite a while. I learned that atrocities like those of the Nazis on Jews cannot be easily forgotten or disregarded.
However, one idea that I haven’t known surprised me: that some Jews like Primo Levi knew that they will be captured on a specific day, and that they needed to prepare for the adversities they will face. Some of them “praying, some deliberately drunk, others lustfully intoxicated for the last time.” To me, it seems like they were preparing for death, doing anything they can to enjoy the last bit of free life left. The book says, “Dawn came on us like a betrayer.” I thought that it would have been very menacing to see the sun rise for the day that they will be captured and be used as slaves, tools, and eventually killed relentlessly. It was also ironical, since sunrise usually represents a new, bright, and hopeful start, usually with an optimistic tone, yet the sunrise the Jews in the book saw was the beginning of their doom.
The author’s detailed and vivid descriptions allow me to more deeply understand the mind state of the people in the camps, and picture the holocaust in general, since I can be clearly informed about the details of it. Hopefully I can grow more mature and not only be shocked or stunned by the extreme aspects of it.
The first chapter of this book reveals much of the true picture of Jewish imprisonment to the concentration camps established by the Nazis. Especially since the book is primarily a first-hand account, it is likely that the author shows a lot of the general feelings that most Jews had when they were sent to the concentration camps, not just the facts of the process of the imprisonment. Most of these feelings were expressed as despair and hopelessness in the first chapter, as they were being sent to the camps on trains.
In the first chapter, I read about the frequently mentioned cruelties of the holocaust, including the disregarding of the German SS soldiers of Jews as humans. A quote in the book says, “Only a profound amazement: how can one hit a man without anger?” I was not surprised by the fact that the Nazi’s severely degraded the Jews’ statuses as humans, but only sickened again by this fact, which I have known for quite a while. I learned that atrocities like those of the Nazis on Jews cannot be easily forgotten or disregarded.
However, one idea that I haven’t known surprised me: that some Jews like Primo Levi knew that they will be captured on a specific day, and that they needed to prepare for the adversities they will face. Some of them “praying, some deliberately drunk, others lustfully intoxicated for the last time.” To me, it seems like they were preparing for death, doing anything they can to enjoy the last bit of free life left. The book says, “Dawn came on us like a betrayer.” I thought that it would have been very menacing to see the sun rise for the day that they will be captured and be used as slaves, tools, and eventually killed relentlessly. It was also ironical, since sunrise usually represents a new, bright, and hopeful start, usually with an optimistic tone, yet the sunrise the Jews in the book saw was the beginning of their doom.
The author’s detailed and vivid descriptions allow me to more deeply understand the mind state of the people in the camps, and picture the holocaust in general, since I can be clearly informed about the details of it. Hopefully I can grow more mature and not only be shocked or stunned by the extreme aspects of it.
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Survival in Auschwitz: Journal #0
The video I saw in class was quite a shock to me, even though I probably knew much information I encountered throughout seeing the video. I was previously quite informed about much of the atrocities of the Nazis, but they seem to be so cruel and inhumane that they shock me every time I see them. The fact that one group of people can hate another like the Nazis did was unbelievable, and their atrocities are even more inconceivable.
It is said in the video that the Nazi’s “Final Solution” in dealing with Jews was basically extermination. Many Germans influenced by the Nazi’s regarded Jews as a dangerous national threat; even the children were regarded to be threatening. Jews were killed relentlessly without sympathy, even to hire special killing squads to murder them along with other people that the Nazi’s opposed.
One of the people mentioned by former concentration camp prisoners was a person called “Mangelo.” He was a German doctor who performed scientific experiments in Birkenau on the bodies of the prisoners. He barely considered morality when doing his experiments, coaxing and taking children of whom many would die because of the experiments. One of the former camp prisoners shown in the video said that Mangelo, after performing an experiment on her, said “Too bad, she is too young; she has only two weeks left.” This carelessness with which a person can say about another’s death struck me. I had questions like, “Where was his moral and ethical mind? Was he ever conscientious?”
Moreover, a former prisoner said that prisoners used to work in crematories, which burned bodies of the dead. I wondered if the Nazi’s knew about the disgust and horror that one would have felt seeing the burning bodies of his fellow prisoners. I thought that one would only worry about the day when one would be killed and burned like one of the burning bodies. Furthermore, since prisoners so often saw fellow prisoners die so instantly and hopelessly because of the atrocities of the S.S. guards, they were used to seeing people die. I have never seen a person actually die in front of me, and I was doubtful if I can see people die everyday, yet the prisoners saw death everyday. The physical and mental harm the Nazis did to the Jews and other concentration camp prisoners was overwhelming to me, and I thanked God that none of it actually happens today in most places of the world.
It is said in the video that the Nazi’s “Final Solution” in dealing with Jews was basically extermination. Many Germans influenced by the Nazi’s regarded Jews as a dangerous national threat; even the children were regarded to be threatening. Jews were killed relentlessly without sympathy, even to hire special killing squads to murder them along with other people that the Nazi’s opposed.
One of the people mentioned by former concentration camp prisoners was a person called “Mangelo.” He was a German doctor who performed scientific experiments in Birkenau on the bodies of the prisoners. He barely considered morality when doing his experiments, coaxing and taking children of whom many would die because of the experiments. One of the former camp prisoners shown in the video said that Mangelo, after performing an experiment on her, said “Too bad, she is too young; she has only two weeks left.” This carelessness with which a person can say about another’s death struck me. I had questions like, “Where was his moral and ethical mind? Was he ever conscientious?”
Moreover, a former prisoner said that prisoners used to work in crematories, which burned bodies of the dead. I wondered if the Nazi’s knew about the disgust and horror that one would have felt seeing the burning bodies of his fellow prisoners. I thought that one would only worry about the day when one would be killed and burned like one of the burning bodies. Furthermore, since prisoners so often saw fellow prisoners die so instantly and hopelessly because of the atrocities of the S.S. guards, they were used to seeing people die. I have never seen a person actually die in front of me, and I was doubtful if I can see people die everyday, yet the prisoners saw death everyday. The physical and mental harm the Nazis did to the Jews and other concentration camp prisoners was overwhelming to me, and I thanked God that none of it actually happens today in most places of the world.
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Connecting with God...
How do I relate to faith? How did Don Richardson relate to Faith? How do the Sawi Relate to faith?
- Faith is present in every society whether or not the people of the society is Christian or not; faith can refer to a belief, confidence, or trust in a particular person or idea as well as belief in God or in the doctrines of his words. Therefore I think we can assume that people around the world all relate to faith, and as Christians are able to introduce God to those who don’t know Him, they are able to connect their own faith to the Faith that God urges us to have. Therefore Don Richardson was able to make connections with ideas in Christianity with those in the Sawi culture to gain trust from the Sawi towards God. Don Richardson primarily relates to Faith by his Christian mindset gained since he was young, when he was in college. He definitely has Faith in God in all his pursuits and actions, and is faithful that God will help him convert the Sawi to true Christians.
The Sawi, who initially were unaware of Christianity, generally had faith in different ways from Don Richardson, as they had faith in their ordinary traditions and customs, such as the waness bind, the custom of gefam ason, and of course, the concept of the Peace Child. They primarily regarded treachery and head-hunting as usual occurrences and ideas to be practiced to become prominent or powerful, which almost is the opposite of what Christianity teaches. Don Richardson connects the idea of Jesus being the Peace Child for any conflicts in the Sawi World, as he states that Myao Kodon is God. Because the Sawi believe that abiding to the concept of Peace Child is mandatory in any circumstance, they gradually trust Jesus and Myao Kodon as their savior, dismissing all other spirits they have believed before. While the Sawi first had faith in their own spirits and traditions, they now have Faith in God and Christianity after Don Richardson introduces them to the religion.
I usually relate to Faith both in Christian and non-Christian terms; when I believe or trust that good things will happen, I relate to a non-Christian faith that allows me to have confidence. However, when I bring God into any type of belief or trust, I relate Faith in Christian ways. Sometimes, though, the Faith I have can be both in Christian and non-Christian aspects.
- Faith is present in every society whether or not the people of the society is Christian or not; faith can refer to a belief, confidence, or trust in a particular person or idea as well as belief in God or in the doctrines of his words. Therefore I think we can assume that people around the world all relate to faith, and as Christians are able to introduce God to those who don’t know Him, they are able to connect their own faith to the Faith that God urges us to have. Therefore Don Richardson was able to make connections with ideas in Christianity with those in the Sawi culture to gain trust from the Sawi towards God. Don Richardson primarily relates to Faith by his Christian mindset gained since he was young, when he was in college. He definitely has Faith in God in all his pursuits and actions, and is faithful that God will help him convert the Sawi to true Christians.
The Sawi, who initially were unaware of Christianity, generally had faith in different ways from Don Richardson, as they had faith in their ordinary traditions and customs, such as the waness bind, the custom of gefam ason, and of course, the concept of the Peace Child. They primarily regarded treachery and head-hunting as usual occurrences and ideas to be practiced to become prominent or powerful, which almost is the opposite of what Christianity teaches. Don Richardson connects the idea of Jesus being the Peace Child for any conflicts in the Sawi World, as he states that Myao Kodon is God. Because the Sawi believe that abiding to the concept of Peace Child is mandatory in any circumstance, they gradually trust Jesus and Myao Kodon as their savior, dismissing all other spirits they have believed before. While the Sawi first had faith in their own spirits and traditions, they now have Faith in God and Christianity after Don Richardson introduces them to the religion.
I usually relate to Faith both in Christian and non-Christian terms; when I believe or trust that good things will happen, I relate to a non-Christian faith that allows me to have confidence. However, when I bring God into any type of belief or trust, I relate Faith in Christian ways. Sometimes, though, the Faith I have can be both in Christian and non-Christian aspects.
The issue of conciliating with different cultures
What should we do when we are confronted with other cultures?
- Cultural diversity is virtually inevitable because people all over the world have different ideas and beliefs. People spread out throughout continents and countries since the beginning of civilization have developed different values, views, and traditions, creating diverse cultures. As there are many different cultures, there has been much contact among them as people of each type confront each other. For example, Europeans and Native Americans in the Americas had to confront each other during the Era of Exploration. These interactions often resulted in violence or treachery, as one group usually attempts to gain as much benefits as possible and disregard the concerns of the other. This was usually the case in the past, although many weren’t so extreme as for the consequences.
However, I think that when people confront other cultures, they should almost always consider the values and thoughts of the people of the other side before attempting to maximize benefits for themselves. When we acknowledge the interests of people who we meet in different environments with different ideas, they will most likely do the same. By doing this, I think Don Richardson was able to successfully convert the Sawi into Christians, as he adapted to their lifestyle and peacefully shared ideas with them, eventually introducing the God. If he tried to force the Sawi to become Christians without considering their situation or values, he would most likely have failed. We often say that when we meet new people, we should respect them, cautious of our actions, and not be fully convinced that our culture is best; we should do the same to people of different cultures. There are good things in other cultures that we may not notice quickly.
- Cultural diversity is virtually inevitable because people all over the world have different ideas and beliefs. People spread out throughout continents and countries since the beginning of civilization have developed different values, views, and traditions, creating diverse cultures. As there are many different cultures, there has been much contact among them as people of each type confront each other. For example, Europeans and Native Americans in the Americas had to confront each other during the Era of Exploration. These interactions often resulted in violence or treachery, as one group usually attempts to gain as much benefits as possible and disregard the concerns of the other. This was usually the case in the past, although many weren’t so extreme as for the consequences.
However, I think that when people confront other cultures, they should almost always consider the values and thoughts of the people of the other side before attempting to maximize benefits for themselves. When we acknowledge the interests of people who we meet in different environments with different ideas, they will most likely do the same. By doing this, I think Don Richardson was able to successfully convert the Sawi into Christians, as he adapted to their lifestyle and peacefully shared ideas with them, eventually introducing the God. If he tried to force the Sawi to become Christians without considering their situation or values, he would most likely have failed. We often say that when we meet new people, we should respect them, cautious of our actions, and not be fully convinced that our culture is best; we should do the same to people of different cultures. There are good things in other cultures that we may not notice quickly.
God wants us to...
What does God expect us to do for other cultures and faiths?
- God primarily expects us, first of all, to trust Him that he will show us the way in introducing people of other cultures and faiths to Him. He wants us to calm and trustful that He will guide us to the best way. He implies through his words that when we confront different types of people and ideas, we should not fully reject them, but acknowledge their long-settled customs that cannot be changed so easily. Even if the other people are hostile towards us, we shall “Love our enemies” as Jesus says, do as much as possible to help them and forgive them even when they are arrogant or disrespectful. God expects us in any circumstance that we spread the love of God to people around the world by doing good for the people, as by charity or missions. Other cultures then will realize that Christianity is after all the true religion for all people and that God will save those who believe in him.
By these endeavors, God want us to spread the Gospel to everyone possible, while being patient even when some people may strongly disagree with Christianity. Don Richardson, for example, saw the Sawi actually praise Judas’s betrayal of Jesus since they value treachery and deceit. However, Richardson was able to use the idea of the Peace Child to convince the Sawi of God’s endless love and Jesus’s crucifiction. Like this, in crises when ideas of Christianity and other cultures significantly differ, God will help us to solve the problem. God expects us to be his messengers as well as students.
- God primarily expects us, first of all, to trust Him that he will show us the way in introducing people of other cultures and faiths to Him. He wants us to calm and trustful that He will guide us to the best way. He implies through his words that when we confront different types of people and ideas, we should not fully reject them, but acknowledge their long-settled customs that cannot be changed so easily. Even if the other people are hostile towards us, we shall “Love our enemies” as Jesus says, do as much as possible to help them and forgive them even when they are arrogant or disrespectful. God expects us in any circumstance that we spread the love of God to people around the world by doing good for the people, as by charity or missions. Other cultures then will realize that Christianity is after all the true religion for all people and that God will save those who believe in him.
By these endeavors, God want us to spread the Gospel to everyone possible, while being patient even when some people may strongly disagree with Christianity. Don Richardson, for example, saw the Sawi actually praise Judas’s betrayal of Jesus since they value treachery and deceit. However, Richardson was able to use the idea of the Peace Child to convince the Sawi of God’s endless love and Jesus’s crucifiction. Like this, in crises when ideas of Christianity and other cultures significantly differ, God will help us to solve the problem. God expects us to be his messengers as well as students.
What can/should societies do?
What should society do for “uncivilized cultures” like the Sawi?”
- What does the society need to for people who are still uneducated, barbaric, and struggling to survive? First of all, it needs to help them survive. All its other pursuits would be futile when they perish. Second, it should familiarize the uncivilized people with the highly developed and civilized parts of today’s world, which may be very unexpected and menacing to them. One of the primary moti
ves of today’s society is helping uncivilized people gain a better standard of living, and this will be possible when these people are familiar with the cultures of the civilized world around them. Without embracing the ideas of the rest of the world, they will not accept the benefits offered by the society. Then the society should introduce tools and methods of living that allow these people to survive more easily and gain better living standards. When the uncivilized people see the benefits of the civilized world, they will accept its ideas and cultures.
Society, however, should definitely not seek to gain profit and other benefits from uncivilized people, at least in initial stages of interaction. This usually leads to a disadvantage to the uncivilized, as the civilized will manipulate the resources and values enjoyed by the former. Profits from uncivilized cultures should only be sought once they are actually civilized and are able to understand how the society around them works. Mutual consent of both sides to trade and interact should take place before any profits are sought by the more civilized. In sum, society should first think about benefiting the uncivilized, motivated by generosity, like Don Richardson, rather than greed.
- What does the society need to for people who are still uneducated, barbaric, and struggling to survive? First of all, it needs to help them survive. All its other pursuits would be futile when they perish. Second, it should familiarize the uncivilized people with the highly developed and civilized parts of today’s world, which may be very unexpected and menacing to them. One of the primary moti
ves of today’s society is helping uncivilized people gain a better standard of living, and this will be possible when these people are familiar with the cultures of the civilized world around them. Without embracing the ideas of the rest of the world, they will not accept the benefits offered by the society. Then the society should introduce tools and methods of living that allow these people to survive more easily and gain better living standards. When the uncivilized people see the benefits of the civilized world, they will accept its ideas and cultures.Society, however, should definitely not seek to gain profit and other benefits from uncivilized people, at least in initial stages of interaction. This usually leads to a disadvantage to the uncivilized, as the civilized will manipulate the resources and values enjoyed by the former. Profits from uncivilized cultures should only be sought once they are actually civilized and are able to understand how the society around them works. Mutual consent of both sides to trade and interact should take place before any profits are sought by the more civilized. In sum, society should first think about benefiting the uncivilized, motivated by generosity, like Don Richardson, rather than greed.
People on a mission
What do mission organizations do for these people?
- Mission organizations primary interact with these types of people in order to help them be acquainted with God and eventually embrace God’s love. The organizations send missionaries like Don Richardson to various parts of the world where people are not fully aware of Christianity, who therefore sometimes live in societies where cultures and customs often oppose to ideas promoted by the gospel. Missionaries in turn attempt to make connections with the cultures of uncivilized people in order to make the concept of Christianity more acceptable to them. During this process, missionaries also help these people significantly in medical or educational aspects, often raising the people’s standards of living.
However, above all these little things, what mission organizations truly do is ultimately save the people who are sometimes corrupted or strayed away from the right way to live. The organizations give these people a chance to accommodate Christianity into their everyday lives and therefore build a peaceful and stable society, which is usually better off than their former societies. Don Richardson, for example, spread Christianity not only to the Sawis but to many native tribes in Papua New Guinea, therefore promoting peace rather than hostility and cannibalism, which were dominant ideas constituting the lives of the natives. During the process he helped the people improve in terms of medical care, food supply, and other resources that increased their living standards.
Despite some exceptions, mission organizations basically send people around the world to spread the gospel to uncivilized people such as the Sawi and help them accept God into their lives, which will most likely promote general welfare.
- Mission organizations primary interact with these types of people in order to help them be acquainted with God and eventually embrace God’s love. The organizations send missionaries like Don Richardson to various parts of the world where people are not fully aware of Christianity, who therefore sometimes live in societies where cultures and customs often oppose to ideas promoted by the gospel. Missionaries in turn attempt to make connections with the cultures of uncivilized people in order to make the concept of Christianity more acceptable to them. During this process, missionaries also help these people significantly in medical or educational aspects, often raising the people’s standards of living.
However, above all these little things, what mission organizations truly do is ultimately save the people who are sometimes corrupted or strayed away from the right way to live. The organizations give these people a chance to accommodate Christianity into their everyday lives and therefore build a peaceful and stable society, which is usually better off than their former societies. Don Richardson, for example, spread Christianity not only to the Sawis but to many native tribes in Papua New Guinea, therefore promoting peace rather than hostility and cannibalism, which were dominant ideas constituting the lives of the natives. During the process he helped the people improve in terms of medical care, food supply, and other resources that increased their living standards.
Despite some exceptions, mission organizations basically send people around the world to spread the gospel to uncivilized people such as the Sawi and help them accept God into their lives, which will most likely promote general welfare.
Interesting aspects of the Sawis
What concepts in the Sawi culture intrigued / reviled /saddened / angered / surprised you?
- I was quite intrigued when I learned that the Sawi’s, along with the other cannibalistic natives around them, do not go head-hunting for daily food; head-hunting is rather an idea that determines the strength of a tribe over another, or the power of the individual who lead the “head-hunt.” Before I reading the book, I thought and assumed that cannibalism was the practice of killing men to supply one’s food supply. When I learned the truth, I was shocked and wondered how such a treacherous practice be a tradition to a whole group of people. I sometimes thought, “Wouldn’t a person living there actually be scared that he himself would be eaten?” But I realized that the practice was just another part of their culture, just as a part of my culture can totally shock the cannibals.
On the other hand, I was very surprised and amazed at how Don Richardson succeeded in converting many Sawis into Christians. At first I questioned the possibility of conciliation between the vastly different ideas of Christianity and cannibalism by a single m
an who had known barely anything about the people he was about to live with. However, as he learned the Sawi language and gradually made connections between Christianity and the Sawi culture, I was amazed at his diligence and skill in influencing the obstinate people dedicated to tradition. I was surprised at the numerous correlations that could be made between aspects of the Sawi culture and Christianity; they seemed to fit together solely for the purpose of the Sawi adopting Christianity. After all, this is another form of a miracle planned by God all along.
- I was quite intrigued when I learned that the Sawi’s, along with the other cannibalistic natives around them, do not go head-hunting for daily food; head-hunting is rather an idea that determines the strength of a tribe over another, or the power of the individual who lead the “head-hunt.” Before I reading the book, I thought and assumed that cannibalism was the practice of killing men to supply one’s food supply. When I learned the truth, I was shocked and wondered how such a treacherous practice be a tradition to a whole group of people. I sometimes thought, “Wouldn’t a person living there actually be scared that he himself would be eaten?” But I realized that the practice was just another part of their culture, just as a part of my culture can totally shock the cannibals.
On the other hand, I was very surprised and amazed at how Don Richardson succeeded in converting many Sawis into Christians. At first I questioned the possibility of conciliation between the vastly different ideas of Christianity and cannibalism by a single m
an who had known barely anything about the people he was about to live with. However, as he learned the Sawi language and gradually made connections between Christianity and the Sawi culture, I was amazed at his diligence and skill in influencing the obstinate people dedicated to tradition. I was surprised at the numerous correlations that could be made between aspects of the Sawi culture and Christianity; they seemed to fit together solely for the purpose of the Sawi adopting Christianity. After all, this is another form of a miracle planned by God all along.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)